Computer-Based Training (CBT) has become a standard method for delivering mandatory education across various military branches. While the intent behind CBTs is sound—uniform training, flexible access, and policy compliance—many service members voice their discontent with the experience. From outdated modules to mind-numbing repetition, the sentiment “I hate CBTs” is far more than just a gripe—it highlights deeper issues in how training is structured and delivered.
This article explores the core frustrations with CBTs and offers practical insights into how the system can evolve to better serve the people it’s meant to educate.
What Are CBTs and Why Do They Exist?
CBTs are digital training programs designed to provide standardized instruction on essential topics, including:
- Self-Aid Buddy Care (SABC)
- Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) awareness
- Cybersecurity training
- Suicide prevention
- Diversity and inclusion education
These modules are intended to be accessible anytime, anywhere, ensuring that service members receive consistent and up-to-date training regardless of their location or schedule.
Why People Say “I Hate CBTs”
1. Lack of Engagement
One of the most common complaints of saying I Hate CBTs is that CBTs are boring. Most modules rely heavily on static text, outdated graphics, and basic multiple-choice quizzes. Without real interaction or narrative, these trainings quickly become forgettable.
2. Time Drain
Many find CBTs consume far more time than necessary. Some modules stretch hours longer than needed due to forced progressions, long-winded presentations, or slow-loading interfaces. When someone has a full workday and then is expected to complete CBTs afterward, frustration naturally builds.
3. Redundant Material
Personnel are often required to complete the same CBTs year after year, even if nothing about the content has changed. This redundancy creates fatigue and leads many to click through modules without actually absorbing the information.
4. Technical Issues
Not all CBT platforms are user-friendly. Whether it’s login errors, browser incompatibility, or poor mobile access, technical issues often create more stress than the training itself.
5. Disconnect from Real Life
Many CBTs feel overly generic or disconnected from the reality of the service member’s job. Without personalization or context, the material feels less relevant and harder to take seriously.
Table: Common CBTs and Reported Frustrations
| CBT Course | Reported Issue |
| Self-Aid Buddy Care (SABC) | Lack of interactive or hands-on training |
| CBRNE Awareness | Complex terms with minimal application tips |
| Cybersecurity Protocols | Too frequent updates, repetitive content |
| Suicide Prevention | Generic delivery of sensitive subject matter |
| Diversity & Inclusion | Lacks contextual examples for service members |
Real Stories from Real People
It’s not uncommon to hear stories from service members who finish a long shift only to log into a slow platform for mandatory CBTs. Many admit to clicking through slides just to finish, retaining little to none of the material. Some openly express that they dread CBT season more than inspection week.
One Airman shared how completing ten CBTs in one weekend not only ruined his plans but also led to sleep deprivation ahead of a physical fitness test. Another recalled being locked out of a course repeatedly due to system errors, only to start over each time.
The Bigger Issue: Morale and Productivity
CBTs, in their current form, are affecting morale. When service members see training as a box to check rather than a meaningful learning opportunity, the intended outcomes—readiness, awareness, and capability—are missed.
Poorly designed CBTs may even become counterproductive. Instead of reinforcing safety procedures or ethical behavior, they encourage shortcuts and disengagement.
Better Alternatives and Solutions
Improving CBTs doesn’t mean removing them altogether. It means evolving the system in ways that respect people’s time, intelligence, and experience. Here are several suggestions:
1. Make Training Interactive
Use modern e-learning techniques like branching scenarios, real-time simulations, and gamified elements to keep learners engaged and encourage participation.
2. Allow Modular Customization
Let units tailor training modules to specific missions, environments, or ranks. This keeps content relevant and increases the likelihood of retention.
3. Shorten and Streamline Courses
Break long modules into smaller, digestible segments. Remove unnecessary filler and offer progress-saving checkpoints so learners can complete modules in shorter bursts.
4. Use Real-World Case Studies
Replace hypothetical examples with real stories or situations that apply directly to the roles of military personnel.
5. Improve Platform Performance
Optimize loading times, ensure mobile compatibility, and provide tech support to minimize frustration from system bugs.
The Role of Leadership
Commanders and supervisors can advocate for their teams by:
- Scheduling CBT time during duty hours
- Consolidating training cycles to avoid repeated disruption
- Providing feedback to training development teams
- Recognizing the strain that excessive or redundant CBTs may place on morale
Why Some CBTs Still Matter
It’s easy to dismiss all CBTs as a nuisance, but many cover crucial topics that can save lives and protect careers. When done correctly, CBTs can enhance situational awareness, improve decision-making, and reinforce critical protocols.
The challenge is not with the existence of CBTs, but with their design and delivery. A well-crafted CBT doesn’t feel like a waste of time—it feels like an investment in capability and safety.
Final Thoughts
Saying “I hate CBTs” isn’t just about venting. It’s about recognizing that the current system can be improved to serve both compliance and comprehension. With modern technology, there’s no excuse for outdated training formats that feel like a chore rather than a contribution to mission readiness.
Reforming how CBTs are delivered isn’t just a convenience—it’s a step toward respecting the time, mental energy, and intelligence of the people who serve.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: What does CBT stand for in the military?
CBT stands for Computer-Based Training, a form of mandatory online learning required for military personnel on various operational and administrative topics.
Q2: Why are CBTs so repetitive?
They are designed to refresh knowledge annually or semi-annually. However, lack of updates and minimal change in format contribute to their repetitive feel.
Q3: Can I do CBTs on my own time?
Yes, but depending on your unit and mission schedule, CBTs are often completed during personal time, which contributes to frustration.
Q4: Are CBTs graded?
Some CBTs include quizzes or tests at the end, and a passing score may be required. These are used to verify comprehension and compliance.
Q5: Is there a better way to complete CBTs quickly?
Reading key sections and focusing on end-of-module reviews can help speed up the process, but rushing through may reduce retention.
